These journalists published the back seat conversations in a book with the name “The Endstra-Tapes” omitting only fillers such as “um” and. Commentaar op de Endstra-Tapes zaak over de vraag of op de ‘ achterbankgesprekken’ auteursrecht rust. De auteur meent van wel en bekritiseert de uitspraak. These journalists published these conversations in a book with the name ‘the Endstra-tapes’ only omitting too many ‘ers’, dots and certain.
|Country:||Central African Republic|
|Published (Last):||16 August 2013|
|PDF File Size:||12.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The recordings of the conversations were handed over to the Nationale Recherche National Investigation Bureau. Open Preview See a Problem? Soray marked it as to-read Jan 27, Preview — De Endstra-tapes by Bart Middelburg.
Endstra’s final work? Dutch copyright: scope of protection remains very wide – Lexology
You can leave a responseor trackback from your own site. Lists with This Book. It is true that there must be human labour and therefore creative choices. Trivia About De Endstra-tapes Etienne Stekelenburg rated it liked it May 19, Rutger rated it liked it Dec 27, The transcripts of 9 conversations and summaries of the other back seat conversations were added to the criminal file and were obtained by two journalists of the Enfstra newspaper the Endstta.
Tot 31 december schreef Bart Beuving wel eens over auteursrecht, e-business, databankenrecht en open source software.
For publication thereof, permission is required from the Endstra heirs. You are commenting using your Twitter account. As long as there is an original expression endztra will generally be sufficient.
In its own words, the court stated: The police started an investigation into his murder and the extortion by the Holleeder-organisation. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. He also accused the Holleeder-organisation of a large number of liquidations.
Sentina rated it did not like it Nov 06, endstea Wat is hier te doen? These courts see the conversations as a businesslike transfer of information. Peter de Wit rated it liked it Sep 01, Suzan rated it liked it Feb 20, The judge finds it implausible that the heirs of the victim should be endangered as a result of the publication of the book.
May 19, Emma rated it did not like it. Nathalie Den Boer is currently reading it Jul 08, It was assessed that the requirements applicable to qualify for copyright protection in The Netherlands are low, but not so low that there was no threshold at all.
The Supreme Court disagreed. In andthe real estate broker Endstra held fifteen confidential conversations with detectives of the Criminal Intelligence Unit.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Share Facebook Twitter Linked In. One comment Seemingly to say that the quality of the conversation counts?
Netherlands : No Copyright in Recorded Conversations with Extortion Victim
The possibility that commercial gain could be derived from the publication is irrelevant. Deze website wordt niet meer bijgewerkt. Inthe Dutch Supreme Court determined that also a scent may qualify for copyright protection. If in the Endstra-tapes sufficiently creative choices were made, these conversations emdstra copyrighted.
On the contrary, given the banality of the design, it cannot be assumed that what was endstrz by Endstra was based on creative labour of any significance.
Wrongfully, according to the Supreme Court. Germain added it Aug 28, Endstra thought he was only transferring information hoping that on this basis the Criminal Intelligence Unit would catch Holleeder and his colleagues.
Nauticamike rated it it was amazing Oct 12, To make sure you do not miss out on regular tapfs from the Kluwer Copyright Blog, please subscribe here.